In the third reading we discover
more about Meursault’s character, especially in his interactions with his
attorney and the prosecutor. Meursault
believes that his case is extremely simple and that all of the questioning is a
waste of his time. He is not a
traditional criminal. Meursualt knows
what he has done and not even the religious pleas by the prosecutor change how
he feels. The prosecutor believes that
“no man was so guilty that God would not forgive him, but in order for that to
happen a man must repent” (Camus 68).
Meursault finds the prosecutor’s though process hard to follow and he
does not see how religion has anything to do with his predicament. Meursault, being fed up with listening to the
prosecutor, acts like he always does “whenever [he wants] to get rid of someone
[he’s] not really listening to, [he] made it appear as if [he] agreed”
(69). Meursault realizes that fighting
this man’s argument is pointless and a further waste of his time, so he tries
to get rid of him. Meursault is a person
who knows what he likes, and when something does not make sense to him or he
does not like something, he attempts to eliminate it from his life.
No comments:
Post a Comment