Wednesday, October 24, 2012

1984 #9 War is Peace, Ignorance is Strength Notes



War is Peace
Three great superstates
Eurasia = Northern part of Europe and Asia (Portugal to Bering Strait)
Oceania = Americas, Atlantic Islands (including British Isles), Australasia, and Southern Africa
Eastasia = China and south, Japan, and large changing portions of Manchuria, Mongolia, & Tibet
Warfare
            Constant
            Similar to Total War in WWII
            No cause for fighting
            Can’t beat each other
            Small # of ppl à specialists
            Few casualties
            No one knows where the fighting actually takes place
            Shortage of goods and occasional bomb in cities
            Motives have changes
Always the same war
Each superstate too evenly matched for there to be a winner
No longer a real reason to fight
            Each superstate has its own thriving economy – no need for the others
            Can find every raw material needed in each superstate
War used for labor
One section constantly fought over; no one superstate controls it all at once
Disputed areas most used for their cheap labor
            Natives of these areas are reduced to slaves (Freedom is Slavery?)
Society veered off its evolutionary path to a tangential one when the Party took over; science and technology achievements slower b/c experimenting practically stopped since way of thinking changed
Increase in gen. wealth threatened hierarchy since hierarchies need poverty and ignorance
            Ignorance in lower levels of hierarchy = stronger upper levels and society?
Goods must be produced but not distributed, therefore constant warfare
            War b/w superstates keeps peace w/in superstates
Use war to destroy products that would make life comfortable
War effort eats up any surplus beyond the bare needs of the public
Needs of public under-estimated, but advantageous: keep people in need, makes small things more important
War establishes the mentality necessary for a hierarchy
            Party members should have mentality of a state of war
Doublethink – some inner party members must know that certain statements about the war are untrue, but they must act as if it is entirely true, and are on their way to victory being greatest power in the world
Goals of the Party: (193)
            Conquer the whole surface of the earth
            Eliminate all possibility of independent thought
Problems need solving:
            How to discover what another human is thinking
            How to kill several hundred million people instantly without warning
All scientific endeavors concerned with the above questions
Atomic bombs have ceased to be used when their power to destroy civilizations and power was demonstrated but all superstates still make and store them
Dream – attack superstate, sign pact, build up bombs to give devastating blow, give devastating blow, sign treaty with other superstate, do same thing
Essential for superstates not to have contact with foreigners except war prisoners and slaves because they would see how they are all similar and have been told lies
Philosophy in each superstate is essentially the same: ingsoc, neo-bolshevism, and death-worship
Lives dedicated to conquest but they know the war must continue forever without victory
Reality only exists in the minimum, past that it can be changed in any way; each superstate is like a separate universe
War is bad word choice – by becoming continuous, war has ceased to exist
An everlasting peace would have the same effect as a continuous war, thus: War is Peace

Ignorance is Strength
High à stay where they are
Middle à change places with the High
Low à create a society when all men are equal (when they have a goal)
The High are inevitably taken over by the Middle who enlist the Low to achieve their goal and then send them back to the bottom
Low are never successful; they see historical change simply as a change in name of their master
Ingsoc, Neo-Bolshevism, and Death-worship à promote ungood and inequality
            Stop progress, High maintain status indefinitely
Hierarchical society no longer necessary when machinery was made à men should live in a state of brotherhood
Authoritarian political structures became the general consensus around the world
High create oligarchical society in Oceania
            Party owns everything in Oceania
            Party members own nothing but their personal belongings
Four Ways to Fall From Power (207)
            Conquered from within
            Masses revolt b/v gov’t is so inefficient
            Strong and discontented Middle comes into being
            Loses self-confidence and willingness to govern
If you could guard against four above, remain in power forever; determined by attitude of High
High only conquerable through slow demographic changes (in current society)
Masses won’t revolt if deprived of all means of comparison b/c won’t realize they’re oppressed
In the eyes of the party, only real threats:
            Spliiting-off of new group of able
            Underemployed
            Power-hungry people
            Growth of liberalism and skepticism within Party ranks
Ignorance of society = strength in the Party’s leadership?
Big Brother = made up character used as the focal point of all emotions of Party members that are usually felt toward an individual












Admission to each level of societal hierarchy by exam at the age of 16
Low level of education because society doesn’t call for it
Party membres can’t have the slightest deviation from the Party’s platform
Party members never alone
No laws, and punishments not given out for committing a crime rather for the potential to commit a crime against the Party at a later date
Crimestop à protective stupidity
Big Brother = omnipotent
Party = infallible
Black-white à to opponent = contradicting plain facts; to party member = willingness to say black is white when Party says so (to know, to believe, to forget the contrary) – doublethink
Past must be manipulated
            So can’t compare current ways of life with anything, so must accept them
            Protect perfect picture of Party
Past is whatever the records and memories agree upon
Doublethink
            If you must change a memory, you must forget you did so
            Hold two contradictory beliefs at once and accept both of them
            Must be conscious but also unconscious
            Able to change history w/ doublethink
Those with the best knowledge of what is happening are the farthest from seeing the world as is
“The greater the understanding, the greater the delusion: the more intelligent the, less sane” (215)
World conquest believed most by those who know it to be impossible
Ministries = delibeate examples of doublethink
Mystery of Party depends on doublethink

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

1984 #3: The Party’s Hypocrisy in Relation to Syme


            Most all of the ministry workers in Airstrip One are essential to the Party’s mission, but many of those same people are at the most risk of being vaporized for thoughtcrime.  People like Syme, the genius tasked with eliminating adjectives for the Eleventh Edition of the Newspeak dictionary, are irreplaceable to the Party.  For the Party’s mission to succeed the Newspeak dictionary must be cut down as much as possible and all alternate meanings stripped so that thoughtcrime becomes impossible.  However, those stripping words of all their meaning are the same people in direct contradiction to the Party’s slogan “IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH” (Orwell 4).  Syme and his dictionary-making colleagues know way too much information about Oldspeak to be safe from a thoughtcrime conviction, but are also essential to the end goal of the Party.  Winston sees this contradiction when Syme talks to him about the future of Newspeak: “Syme will be vaporized.  He is too intelligent.  He sees too clearly and speaks too plainly.  The Party does not like such people” (53).  The irony in this thought is that the Party has to like Syme because he is creating the language that achieves the end goal, but they cannot like him because he knows too much about it.  Although the Party has a use for Syme now, he will soon be out of a job because they are currently working on the Eleventh and “definitive edition” of the Newspeak dictionary (50).  The publication of the final dictionary will mark a time when those, such as Syme, that know too much about Oldspeak can finally be vaporized because their knowledge is no longer needed.  The elimination of Syme and his colleagues is inevitable because of their knowledge of Oldspeak, which can threaten the Party’s goal to communicate solely in Newspeak and eliminate thoughtcrime.  Although an unknowledgeable bystander might think that killing the same people that help you accomplish your goals is unfathomable, it must be done for the goal of the party to be achieved.  The hypocrisy behind who the Party has working for them is astonishing because they need extremely intelligent people to eliminate all intelligence in people, but these same intelligent people know way to much to be considered ideal party members and must be vaporized.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

1984 #1: The Inherent Paradoxical Nature of The Party

            In chapter one part one of George Orwell’s 1984, the reader is introduced to the Party. The Party is synonymous with the government and controls all aspects of people’s lives.  The Party’s slogans are one of the first things the reader learns about the Party; “WAR IS PEACE / FREEDOM IS SLAVERY / IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH” (Orwell 4).  These three statements are mind-boggling to those living in a non-socialist environment and seemingly paradoxical.  War has an exceedingly negative connotation whereas peace has quite the positive connotation and equating the two of them leads to quite the paradox.  With the comparison of freedom and slavery the same thing occurs; slavery and freedom are considered antonyms so their equating creates a paradox.  The third slogan, “ignorance is strength” is a paradox as well; knowledge is power is the socially accepted belief, but to say that ignorance, an antonym to knowledge, is strength, a synonym of power, creates a statement that makes no sense in accepted societal context, therefore creating a third major paradox of the Party’.  The fact that the Party is based on three seemingly paradoxical ideas indicates that the Party is attempting to instill false truths in its subjects.  This false representation of the truth by the Party, although fairly synonymous with politics and government (when looked at with a cynical view), tells the reader that the Party is ungood (as one would say in Newspeak).  Orwell is metonymically comparing the Party to what he sees all governments becoming in the future, and he uses paradoxes as the Party’s slogans to portray his beliefs that oligarchies are inherently bad and this progression of the world’s governments must be stopped before it is too late.